What concept suggests that a large arsenal of weapons can deter a potential enemy from attacking?

The concept that a large arsenal of weapons can deter a potential enemy from attacking is known as deterrence. This theory operates on the idea that the possession of significant military capabilities, including nuclear weapons, creates a situation where potential aggressors are dissuaded from initiating conflict out of fear of the consequences they would face. The logic is that if a state believes an attack would result in unacceptable damage to itself, the likelihood of it launching an offensive action decreases.

This principle has played a crucial role in international relations, especially during the Cold War, where both the United States and the Soviet Union maintained extensive arsenals of nuclear weapons, effectively creating a balance of terror. Each side was deterred from engaging in direct military conflict for fear of mutual destruction.

Other options do not encapsulate this specific idea as effectively. While a defense strategy encompasses various approaches to protect a nation, it does not specifically imply the use of overwhelming force as a means to prevent attacks. Military presence refers to having troops or defense systems stationed in a location, which can project power but does not inherently imply a deterrent effect based solely on possession of weapons. Active engagement suggests actively participating in conflict, rather than preventing it through deterrence.